Tuesday , July 27 2021

The best crossing between Natalie Weber and a member of the jury: "You're saying something, do not interfere …"



The participant, Natalie WeberHe was one of the low profile competitors, however, after the controversy Gladys The Tucumana BombHe woke up and now has several clashes, especially with the participants and the juries Dance 2018.

Related news

On this occasion, and as in the free rhythm, the model could not dance through injuries, and its place was busy Mariela "Chipi" Anchipi, but the decision of the replacement would not please the whole jury, and Marcelo Polino, I did not hide your discomfort and destroyed the participant.

"It seems very unfair that they put a professional dancer to replace a girl who does not know how to do anything. It's almost the worst of the contest and they put one of the best dancers that went through this track. I think he's a fan"Polino said.

After the statements of the journalist, Natalie became infuriated and replied: "Telling me that I do not do anything seems aggressive"Almost nothing," corrected the sharp judge, but continued the response to the controversy and the cross between the two.

"Your notes have always been good, I do not know what you are using to say this. The replacement was decided by the production, not by me. He's saying something. I do not spoil it with your work, "said Mauro Zrate's wife, however, Polino did not like her response and added:"I'm backed by 11 years. Of you, a month and a half ago, we did not know your name"Sentenced the driver of program specialists.

Without reaching an agreement, Weber notes: "We are both people, it is no longer waltz. You are attacking me. To say you do not know me, to do nothing. "To close the strong confrontation between the two, Polino went more and responded with force:" I've known him since the race began and I will say that as a participant, Along with La Chipi, you do not know how to do anything. And keep it up. It's not aggression, it's my opinion as a juror. Your previous ones are a very bad emblem and guarantee, "he concluded.

I saw the confrontation between the jury and the participant:


Source link